SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 1099

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Kota Sivaram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Nagandla Veera Brahmam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:G.Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1, K.Jyothi Prasad, Advocate.

Judgment :

The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.108 of 2000 in the Court of Junior Civil Judge, Parchur against the appellant and respondents 2 to 8 for the relief of specific performance of an agreement of sale, dated 31.3.1984. He pleaded that the suit schedule property of Ac.0.03 cents owned by Sri Kota Venkatarlu, father of the appellant and respondents 2 and 3, was given on lease in the year 1978 for establishing a work shop and that on 31.03.1984, Venkateswarlu executed an agreement of sale for sale of the property for a consideration of Rs.5,000/-. On the same day, the entire consideration is said to have been paid. It was alleged that demand was made against Venkateswarlu for execution of sale deed but he did not execute the same till he died on 31.01.1994. Thereafter, a notice is said to have been issued to the appellant and respondents 2 and 3 on 29.06.2000 calling upon them to execute the sale deed and since they did not take any steps, the suit was filed. He expressed his readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

2. The appellant and the 3rd respondent filed a written statement opposing the suit. It was stated that the property was owned by their mother b






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top