SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(AP) 1108

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Atluri Kuchela Rao – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:B. Adinarayana Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Government Pleader for Arbitration.

Judgment :

The appellant filed O.S.No.1121 of 1992 in the Court of VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for the relief of declaration of title and perpetual injunction, in respect of the suit schedule property of a plot of 370 square yards in Road No.3, Banjara Hills. He stated that the suit schedule property is part of plot No.11, carved out by erstwhile Jubilee Hills Municipality; and its allottee Smt.Safia Begum sold it in favour of one Smt. Rangamma and others through sale deed, dated 12.04.1965, under Ex.A.3 and that Ragamma and another, in turn, divided that land into 12 plots and sub-plot No.11, admeasuring 1849.66 square metres, was sold to smt.Iqubal Begum Sayed, in the year 1969. She, in turn, is said to have sold 648 square yards to the appellant under Ex.A.1, dated 05.10.1978. Out of this, the appellant is said to have sold 278 square yards through a document, dated 15.05.1992. It was also mentioned that the respondents made an attempt to recover the possession of the suit schedule property and other extents from the vendors by filing L.G.C.Nos.26 of 1990 and 36 of 1991 and that the Special Court constituted under the A.P. Land Grabbing (Prohibition) Act























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top