G.ROHINI
Kambala Sesharatnam – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Bhoodan Yagna Board – Respondent
Though reliefs sought are different, the subject-matter is common and both the writ petitions are between the same parties. Hence they are heard together and decided by this common order.
The petitioners are the sons and daughter of one Penkey Raghavulu who is stated to have purchased the land admeasuring Ac.9-51 cents in Sy.Nos.276/8, 276/23, 278/1 and 278/1-3 of Ramanaiahpeta Village of Kakinada Rural Mandal, East Godavari District in the year 1962. It is pleaded that on the death of their father on 5.5.2010 the petitioners have succeeded to the said property and have been continuing in possession and enjoyment of the same.
However, A.P. Bhoodan Yagna Board (for short, Bhoodan Board) claimed that the said land was donated to Bhoodan Board in the year 1964 by one Paida Suryanarayana Murthy and that the petitioners had illegally occupied the said land. At the instance of the Bhoodan Board when the resumption proceedings were initiated in the year 2007 under the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 (for short, Assigned Lands (POT) Act, 1977), the petitioners herein filed W.P.No.10286 of 2007 and etc. The said writ petitions were allowed by this Court by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.