SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 430

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Venkannagari Naveen Rao – Appellant
Versus
Joint Sub-Registrar-I, Sangareddy – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:M.S.R.Subrahmanyam, Advocate.
For the Respondents: GP for Revenue.

Judgment :

The petitioners intended to purchase Ac.23-01 guntas of land in Survey Nos.120/29, 30 and 32 of Pedda Kanjirla Village, Patancheru Mandal, Medak District. The sale deed was executed in their favour on 18.11.2011 by the vendors by names Raju Kumar Tandon, Shani Tandon, Praveen Dawar, etc. The document was presented before the Joint Sub-Registrar-I, Sanga Reddy-the first respondent. He refused to register the document by stating the reasons through memo, dated 30.01.2012. He stated that the document was presented on 03.12.2011, but before the registration was effected, he received information from one P.Vinod Kumar, Advocate, to the effect that orders of temporary injunction are operative vis-à-vis the land in two suits being O.S.No.340 of 2011 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy and O.S.No.120 of 2011 on the file of the Family Court-cum-VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sanga Reddy. The particulars of the Interlocutory applications in which the orders were passed were also mentioned. By referring to Standing Order No.219 (b), the first respondent expressed his disinclination to register the document. The petitioners feel aggrieved








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top