R.KANTHA RAO
Manne Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Regalla Uma – Respondent
Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant. Though served with notice, none appeared for the respondents.
2. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the award dated 06-05-1996 passed in MVOP.No. 1221 of 2004 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Khammam.
3. The learned Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant-claimant under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,000=00 for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident on the ground that the appellant failed to prove the alleged involvement of the vehicle namely the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident. Challenging the said finding, the present appeal is filed.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that even though there is evidence of PW-1 showing the involvement of the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident and also that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the said car, the learned Claims Tribunal erroneously dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant.
5. The reason for dismissing the claim-petition by the learned Claims Tribunal is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.