SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 159

R.KANTHA RAO
Manne Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Regalla Uma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:M/s. Ravulapati Sreenivasa Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondents: None appeared.

Judgment :

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant-claimant. Though served with notice, none appeared for the respondents.

2. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed challenging the award dated 06-05-1996 passed in MVOP.No. 1221 of 2004 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Principal District Judge), Khammam.

3. The learned Claims Tribunal dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant-claimant under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs.1,50,000=00 for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident on the ground that the appellant failed to prove the alleged involvement of the vehicle namely the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident. Challenging the said finding, the present appeal is filed.

4. The learned counsel for the appellant would submit that even though there is evidence of PW-1 showing the involvement of the car bearing No.GJ-2K-6632 in the accident and also that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the said car, the learned Claims Tribunal erroneously dismissed the claim-petition filed by the appellant.

5. The reason for dismissing the claim-petition by the learned Claims Tribunal is




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top