SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 519

SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU
M. Varalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Nagaram Kavitha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:L.Harish, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Additional Public Prosecutor.

Judgment :

The petitioners 1 and 2/A.1 and A.2 are accused of offences punishable under Sections 385, 354 and 506 Part II IPC. It is alleged that on 16.05.2012 at 11:30 A.M., when the 1st respondent/ de facto complainant was at Primary Health Centre, Yalal, A.1 and A.2 approached her and requested her to go for Panchayat along with them to Sub-Divisional Police Officer, Vikarabad where they have arranged the compromise in the previous criminal case. Previous criminal case in Cr.No.31 of 2012 relates to offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 497, 509, 323 and 506 Part II IPC. It is further alleged that when the 1st respondent refused to accompany them, A.1 and A.2 picked up quarrel with her, threatened her with dire consequences, pulled her tuft of hair, beat her indiscriminately and torn her blouse while patients and staff of Primary Health Centre were present and thereby insulted her modesty. Truth or otherwise of the said allegations is a question of fact, which this Court may not be in a position to go into and decide the same in this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. It is contended by the petitioners’ counsel that at any rate, Section 354 IPC cannot be applied to the facts




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top