SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 478

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
S. Laxma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Bankatlal Mandhani, Advocate.
For the Respondents: G.P. for Revenue.

Judgment :

The petitioners state that their ancestors owned an extent of Ac.7.08 guntas of land in Survey No.383/2 of Torrur Village, Hayatnagr Mandal, Ranga Reddy District and that the said land was the subject matter of partition under Document No.2736 of 1976. It is also stated that Ac.3.00 of the said land was gifted to the 2nd petitioner through document No.769/91 on the file of the Sub-Registrar, Vanasthalipuram, 2nd respondent herein. The first petitioner is said to be the owner of Ac.2.06 guntas of land.

The petitioners intended to sell a part of the land referred to above. They claim to have approached the 2nd respondent herein with a request to furnish the particulars of market value, stamp duty, registration fee etc. Their grievance is that the 2nd respondent is refusing to furnish the particulars on the ground that the land in Survey No.383/2 was included in the list of Government properties and the 2nd respondent is enforcing the prohibition contained under Section 22-A of the Registration Act (for short ‘the Act’).

The petitioners submit that at no pint of time, the land was held by the Government. It is also their case that not only the names of their ancestors were s











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top