SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 235

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
M. R. Anjaneyulu – Appellant
Versus
R. Subrahmanyam Achary – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.Nageshwar Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment :-

This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated 17-10-2011, in IA.No.829 of 2011 in OS.No.139 of 2007, on the file of the Court of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Palamaner, Chittoor District.

The respondent filed the above-mentioned suit for recovery of a certain amount. The petitioner, who is defendant in the said suit, filed written statement. Thereafter, when the case was coming up for the cross-examination of the respondent/plaintiff, the petitioner filed the above-mentioned IA for permitting him to file registered sale deed, dated 26-12-1994, and a registered notice. The said application was dismissed by the lower Court on the sole ground that the petitioner has not come forth with proper reasons for permitting him to file the proposed documents. Aggrieved thereby, the petitioner filed the present Civil Revision Petition.

Even though notice was served on the respondent, there is no representation for him at the hearing.

In his affidavit, the petitioner has stated that the suit schedule property originally belonged to and was in possession and enjoyment of one Smt.Subbamma, W/o late N.R.Sreenivasulu, and her son N.S.Sreeramulu; that the said Subbamma and her





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top