SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 275

High Court of Andhra Pradesh
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR
S. Kesava Rao & Others
Versus
The Chairman & Managing Director, APSPDCL, Corporate office, Tirupathi, Chittor district & Others
WP 8794 & 17457 OF 2007, 20719 & 22035 OF 2008, 27252, 28352, 28362 & 29180 OF 2009, 2487, 3039, 6981, 7739, 9129, 10560 & 15062 OF 2010, 21099, 21326, 21583, 21600, 21715, 21759, 21764, 21893, 21990, 21922, 21933, 21941, 22012, 22130, 22177, 22274, 22352, 22403, 22434, 22603, 22782, 22791, 22795, 22806, 22811, 22813, 22950, 22963, 23008, 23027, 23028, 23029, 23034, 23044, 23074, 23093, 23094, 23403, 23404, 23411, 23412, 23530, 23694, 23695, 23727, 23750, 23926, 24029, 24129, 24138 OF 2011
Decided on : 14-03-2012

Advocates appeared:
For the Appearing Parties:Peeta Raman, G. Vidyasagar, P.R. Balarami Reddy (SC for AP TRANSCO), Government Pleader for Energy, K.V.N. Bhupal, Ande Ravi Kumar, Mrs. K. Udaya Sri, Advocate General, A. Durga Bhaskar, M. Surender Rao, Government Pleader for Labour, Government Pleader for General Administration, Government Pleader for Finance and Planning, P. Lakshma Reddy, N. Subba Reddy for Chandraiah Sunkara, M. Venkat Ram Reddy, Shyam s. Agrawal, D. Bala Kishan Rao, Samineni Kishore, M.V Rama Rao, Bathini Papa Rao Goud, D. Linga Rao, Narendar Jalli, N.M. Krishnaiah, (Mrs.) G. Jyothi Eswar (SC for APEPDCL), Venkat Reddy Thipparthi, R. Rajesh Nehta, V. Venkata Mayur, Gangisetty Rajeswara Rao, D.L. Pandu, Parsa Ananth Nageswar Rao, K. Vasudeva Reddy, Mekala Uday Kiran, E. Venkata Reddy, K. Venkatesh, Harender Prasad, S. Chandrasekhar, S. Ravindranath, D. Srinivas Rao, Thalapally Rajashekhar & A.K. Jayaprakash Rao, Advocates.

Headnote:A.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD EMPLOYEES SERVICE REGULATIONS, Parts I, II and III - Andhra Electricity Department Operation Subordinate Service Rules - Recruitment of Junior Linemen - Qualification, experience and age for the selection be considered as on the first notification dated 6/8-6-2006 only— Preference shall be given to the experience depending upon the length of service and whoever is working as on the date of fist notification alone be treated as contract labour but subsequent experience cannot be taken into account - If contract labour and fresh candidate applies, the contract labour will be given preference for selection---Directions given to respondents to review the entire selection process and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law and fill up the subsequent vacancies by issuing a notification calling for applications from eligible candidates by giving preference to contract labour as per Rules. (Paras 18 and 26)

Judgment :

COMMON JUDGMENT:

V. ESWARAIAH

Heard Mr. N. Subba Reddy, learned senior counsel for Mr Chandraiah Sunkara, Mr. M Venkata Ram Reddy, Mr. Peeta Raman, Mr. D.L. Pandu, Mr K.V.N.Bhupal, Mr D.Balkishan Rao, Mr V.Venkata Mayur and Mr R.Rajesh Netha for the writ petitioners and Mr A.K.Jayaprakash and Mr S Ravindranath for appeallants in writ appeals and the learned Advocate General appearing for the Government, A.P.Transco and four distribution companies and Mr.G.Vidyasagar, learned counsel.

A simple issue has been complicated at various levels by various authorities, consequential of which, the present batch of writ petitions and writ appeals are filed.

The Indian Electricity Act, 1910 created the basic frame work for electricity supply industry in India and thereafter Electricity Supply Act, 1948 mandated the creation of the State Electricity Boards. The State Electricity Board has a responsibility of arranging the supply of electricity in the State. Thereafter Electricity Act, 2003 came into force and with subsequent amendments consolidating the law relating to generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of electricity in India.

The erstwhile Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board (for short APSEB) issued regulations in exercise of power conferred under Section 79 (c) and (k) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, whereunder the APSEB has got power to make regulations by issuance of a notification in the official gazette relating to the “duties of officers and other employees of the Board and their salaries, allowances and other conditions of service” and “any other matter arising out of the Board’s functions under this Act for which it is necessary or expedient to make regulations.’ Under Section 79 (c) and (k) of the Electricity Supply Act, 1948, the APSEB has framed service regulations called A.P. State Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations – Part –I, Part-II and Part –III and the same are published in the year 1968 and 1970 and came into force from the date of publication.

Under Service Regulation 3 (d) of Part I,

“The Board may absorb a person appointed on contract basis into the Board corresponding cadres in the Board’s service on a permanent basis. Such persons may, in the discretion of the Board, be given credit for the full period of their contract service or part there of and thereupon such service shall be taken into account for all purposes, including seniority, probation, leave and pension”.

Under Service Regulation 6 of Part I,

“The Board may adopt its own classification of service, re-arrange grades, re-fix responsibilities and prescribe minimum educational, technical and other qualifications as may be considered suitable for making selection and appointments to posts in each class of service”.

Under Service Regulation 7 of Part I, “ All employees joining the service of the Board shall be deemed to be new entrants into the service of the Board and their retention or otherwise in employment will depend on the result of the Board’s review of the staff requirements from time to time depending on the exigencies of works……..”.

The A.P. State Electricity board Employees Service Regulations Part II, apply to all employees of the APSEB including those employed under the contracts and on deputation from the Government, who draw their pay once a month in a time scale of pay.

There are various classes and categories within the class. The last grade is Class IV consisting of various categories from 1 to 14. But, the post of Junior Lineman (for short JLM) or Wireman or Helper etc, is not there in the Service Regulations.

Service Regulation 2, Part III deals with ‘method of recruitment’. Regulation 2 (ii) deals with method of recruitment of class IV employees, which is by direct recruitment by the appointing authority authorized by the APSEB in such a manner as may be ordered by the APSEB from time to time. The relevant portion reads as under;

“(ii). Selection for appointment by direct recru


































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top