High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Gopala Krishna Tamada, J.
Madas Venkat Goud : Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh : Respondent
Crl. A No.1439 of 2007
Decided On : Apr 13, 2010
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 304 – Appeal against conviction - Passports Act, 1967 –Section 12(1)(b) - – Criminal Procedure Code –Section 313 – Examination of accused - During the course of trial on behalf of the prosecution were examined were marked - On behalf of the defence was examined and was marked - After analyzing both oral and documentary evidence and after hearing both sides the trial Court found the accused guilty of the offences and accordingly convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence and also sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence graveman of the charge against the accused is the accused subjected his wife called the deceased to cruelty and harassed her for additional dowry on account of which her health got deteriorated and ultimately she died - Charge against the accused is that while obtaining a passport he suppressed his marital status and did not mention the name of his wife the deceased in the application - Sake of convenience the parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the Sessions Case – Held, Information about the marital status or educational qualification of the accused in no way differ the situation - During the course Cr.P.C. examination the accused has stated that he approached a broker and simply signed the documents and the details in the said application form have been filled in by the broker - Approaching the broker and filling the application is not expected to and it may attract a different provision of law, but not the provision - Court is of the view that the Court below erred in coming to the conclusion that the accused is guilty of the offence falling criminal appeal is allowed and the conviction and sentence imposed against the appellant/accused by the learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge by judgment are set aside and consequently the appellant/accused is acquitted of the charges levelled against him - Fine amount if any paid by the appellant/accused shall be refunded to him –Appeal is Allowed.
(1) The sole accused in SC No.167 of 2005 on the file of the I Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, is the appellant herein. The learned Judge tried the appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 304-B IPC and 12(1)(b) of the Passports Act, 1967 (for short "the Act"). During the course of trial, on behalf of the prosecution, PWs.1 to 12 were examined and Exs.Pl to P9 were marked. On behalf of the defence, DW1 was examined and Ex.D1 was marked. After analyzing both oral and documentary evidence and after hearing both sides, the trial Court found the accused guilty of the offences, and accordingly, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years for the offence under Section 304-B IPC, and also sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000.00 in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months, for the offence under Section 12(l)(b) of the Act.
(2) The graveman of the charge against the accused is that at Saleem Nagar Colony, Prasanth Nagar, Malakpeta, Hyderabad, the accused subjected his wife Smt. Aravindasree, hereafter called the deceased, to cruelty and harassed her for additional dowry, on account of which, her health got deteriorated and ultimately she died on 27/9/2001. Further, the charge against the accused is that while obtaining a passport, he suppressed his marital status and did not mention the name of his wife, the deceased, in the application.
For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the Sessions Case.
(3) The case of the prosecution as culled out during the course of trial is as follows:
(i) PW1, a doctor by profession, is the father of the deceased. The marriage between the deceased and the accused was performed on 30/1/1998 and at the time of marriage, an amount of Rs.3 lakh in cash, 60 tulas of gold, 20 tulas of silver, one residential building situated at Saleem Nagar Colony, a Maruthi Car, and other household articles, were given by way of dowry. After the marriage, both of them lived together happily for a period of six months, and subsequently, the accused got a seat in M.S. Course at Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad. After joining in the said course, he used to bring girl friends to the house and behave indecently with the deceased. Though the deceased objected the said conduct, the accused did not heed to her words and used to beat her mercilessly.
(ii) In the month of December, 1999 on a telephone call from the accused, PW1, father of the deceased, rushed to their house and found the deceased doused in kerosene and he was informed by the deceased that the accused was demanding an amount of Rs.10 lakh to go abroad. Then, PW1 expressed his inability to meet the said demand, and when he warned the accused that he would report the matter to the police, the parents of the accused requested him not to lodge a report with the police, and further, the accused promised PW1 stating that he would look after the deceased well. Thereafter, PW1 used to send money to the accused for family expenses, since the financial condition of the accused was very week.
(iii) In the month of February, 1999, the appellant obtained a passport and while making an application for passport, he suppressed his marital status stating that he is not married. As the accused was threatening the deceased that he would go abroad by leaving her, the said fact was brought to the notice of the passport authorities.
(iv) In the month of March, 2000 the accused came to his house in drunken condition and forced the deceased to consume alcohol and when she refused, he beat her mercilessly and further tried to kill her by pressing her face with a pillow. When the same was informed by the deceased to PW1, he took her to his house. But, again on the request of the parents of the accused and on their assurance that the accused will look after the deceased well, the deceased was sent back to the accused. In sp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.