SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 157

BHASKAR RAO
K. SIVARAM – Appellant
Versus
K. MANGALAMBA – Respondent


JUDGEMENT

The husband is the revision petitioner. He filed this revision against the Judgement of the Court of the IInd Addl. Munsiff Magistrate, Ongole in M. C. No. 8/1982. The facts of the case are that the petitioner herein is a handicapped person having lost both his legs due to polio. He is working as an Officer in the Accountant General's Office at Hyderabad. He married the respondent No. 1 in the month of December, 1969 who is a deaf and dumb lady, out of sympathy to the handicapped persons. Thereafter they lived amicably and happily. Respondent No. 2 is the elder daughter born to them on 9-4-1972. Respondent No. 3 is the younger daughter born to them on 27-7-1974, and the family lived happily up to the year 1982. Thereafter, it is the case of the respondents that they were thrown out by the petitioner from his house on 17-6-1982 by giving them Rs. 70/- and asking them to go to the parents house of respondent No. 1. Accordingly, they went there and there they lived. Thus, they have been neglected to be maintained by the petitioner who is having sufficient means and that they have no means to maintain themselves, therefore, they filed the petition. The petitioner herei




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top