B.CHANDRA KUMAR
State of A. P. rep. by Collector, Hyderabad District, Nampally, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
B. Ranga Reddy – Respondent
The preliminary objection raised by Sri Challa Sitaramaiah, learned Senior Counsel, representing Sri B. Rajendra and M. Narender Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents, is that the present appeal is not maintainable since the appellants herein i.e., State of Andhra Pradesh have not challenged the common findings in O.S. Nos.274 and 276 of 1983, but challenged only the findings in O.S. No.141 of 1984 and, therefore, this appeal is hit by the principle of Res judicata.
The brief facts of the case are as follows. One Ghulam Ahmed Khan filed O.S. No.274 of 1983 claiming title to an extent of Ac.6.08 guntas in Survey No.9/13, Khairatabad village, within the specified boundaries seeking declaration of title and for injunction. One Mohd. Osman filed O.S. No.276 of 1983 claiming title to an extent of Ac.3.00 guntas in Survey No.9/13 of Khairatabad village within the specified boundaries. One Ranga Reddy, Vijaya Reddy and 7 others filed O.S. No.141 of 1984 claiming title to an extent of Ac.19.23 guntas in Survey Nos.49 and 50 in Rasoolpura village, Hyderabad within the specified boundaries. In all these suits, the relief sought is declaration of title and injunction and certain
Baldev Singh v. Surinder Mohan Sharma
Iftikhar Ahmed and others v. Syed Meharban Ali and others
Laxman Tatyaba Kankate and another v. Taramati Harishchandra Dhatrak
Madhukar D. Shende v. Tarabai Aba Shedage
Makhija Construction and Engineering (Petitioner) Limited v. Indore Development Authority
Pandit Ishwardas v. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Rachakonda Narayana v. Ponthala Parvathamma
S. Nazeer Ahmed v. State Bank of Mysore
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.