SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 732

G.KRISHNA MOHAN REDDY
Seelam Koti Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:C. Raghu, Advocate.
For the Respondents: R1, Public Prosecutor, R2, None appeared.

Judgment :

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash order dated 26-10-2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.287 of 2009 in C.P.R.No.227 of 2009 on the file of I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nizamabad.

2. Whereas the petitioner herein is the accused the second respondent herein is the complainant in the proceedings before the Court below. For the sake of convenience, I refer the parties as arrayed in the proceedings before the Court below.

3. The facts of the case are as follows:

The Accused is the Proprietor of M/s. Seeko Biotics, Krishna Nagar, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District, which is the manufacturer and supplier of a drug by name ‘FYTE’. On 20-10-2008 the complainant, being the Drug Inspector, visited the shop of the accused and collected samples of the said drug observing necessary formalities. The complainant sent one of the samples to the Government Analyst, Drugs Control Laboratory, Hyderabad, for analysis and report. Subsequently analyst report was received therefrom with the endorsement “Not of standard quality”. Therefore, the complainant issued a notice dated 24-08-2009 to the accused informing about the outcome of the analysis of the sa


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top