SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 912

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Ponnapoola Seetha Ramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Sanagala Sreenivasulu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:V. Roopesh Kumar Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G. Venkateswarlu, Advocate.

Judgment

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 22-2-2012 in I.A.No.626/2011 in O.S.No.159/2010 on the file of the learned V Additional District Judge, Nellore. The respondent filed the above mentioned suit for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 7-3-2005. He filed the above mentioned I.A. to permit him to mark the said agreement of sale in evidence on his side. The petitioner/defendant filed a counter-affidavit opposing the same on the ground that the endorsement made on the back of the agreement of sale in question evidences delivery of possession of the property agreed to be sold thereunder and therefore it requires stamp duty and registration under Article 47-A of Schedule 1-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 (for short "the Act"). However, the Court below has allowed the I.A. filed by the respondent/plaintiff. Feeling aggrieved thereby, the petitioner/defendant filed this Civil Revision Petition.

A perusal of the order of the lower Court shows that it has relied upon the Judgments of this Court in Sri Lakshmi Housing Enterprises, Hyderabad Vs. Haji Begum and others (2010(5) ALD 819)and Cheryala Srinivas Vs. Moola Sujatha and others (2010 (1) ALD 246







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top