SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 958

NOUSHAD ALI
Athapuram Raghuramaiah – Appellant
Versus
Dyava Ramaiah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:P.V. Narayana Ra, Advocate.
For the Respondents:V.V. Ramana Rao, Advocate.

Judgment

This Civil Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 02.03.2010 in O.S.No.43 of 2008 passed by the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, wherein it has been held that Exs.B-1 to B-3 documents marked through D.W.1 were deficiently stamped and accordingly directed the concerned party to take steps for impounding the documents either before the Court or before the concerned authorities.

2. The respondent herein filed suit O.S.No.43 of 2008 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Vemulavada, Karimnagar District, impleading the petitioners herein as defendants seeking a decree for perpetual injunction restraining them from entering into and interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property measuring Ac.0.04 ½ gts of land in Sy.No.43/A situated at Kurikyala Village, Gangadhar Mandal, Karimnagar District. According to the plaint averments, the respondent-plaintiff is the absolute owner and is in exclusive possession of the said property. His name is also reflected in the revenue records, including the Pattadar Pass Book. The petitioners-defendants are strangers to the said land and they have no right or interest whatsoe






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top