SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 918

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Shaik Ujauddin – Appellant
Versus
Veerabhadra Uma Devi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:S. Syam Sunder Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:R1, B. Chinnapa Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment

This Civil Revision Petition is filed against order dated 16-3-2012 in I.A.No.284/2012 in O.S.No.104/2008 on the file of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Mangalagiri. The petitioner filed the above mentioned suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondents herein from interfering with his possession of the suit schedule property. Respondent No.1 is defendant No.3 in the suit. She has filed a written statement denying the petitioner’s claim that he was granted patta by the Revenue officials, and has set up the plea that the Tahsildar, Tadikonda village and Mandal has granted patta in her favour. Respondent No.1 has filed the above mentioned I.A. under Order XVI Rule 1 r/w. Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short “the CPC”) to issue summons to the Tahsildar, Tadikonda village and Mandal, Guntur District, for giving evidence on her behalf regarding issuance of patta in her favour and also to prove that the Tahsildar has issued notice dated 13-5-2008 to both the parties. The petitioner/plaintiff, as respondent No.1, filed a counter-affidavit resisting the said application. The lower Court by a non-speaking order allowed the said I.A. Feeli





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top