SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 1073

N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
T. Niranjan – Appellant
Versus
Ch. Ramesh Chander Reddy – Respondent


Judgment

This petition is filed for transfer of O.S.No.644 of 2010 on the file of the Court of II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, to the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, as the connected suits O.S.No.317 of 2010 and O.S.No.248 of 2011 are pending on the file of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. It is alleged that the petitioner is the defendant in all the three suits and there was an understanding with regard to the payments of the amounts and the defence in all the suits is common and nature of evidence to be adduced is the same. When this Court questioned as to why the application is filed before this Court when the remedy under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘CPC’) can be availed before the Chief Judge, the learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that in view of the decision of this Court reported in ManchukondaVenkata Jagannadham v. Chettipalli Bullamma and others (AIR 2011 AP 104), the said transfer application is not being entertained and consequently it has become a bar.

3. According to the purport of the above judgment, Additional District Judge is not subordinate to the District Jud



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top