N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
Pagadala Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
J. Radha Krishna – Respondent
The defendants in O.S.No.21 of 1994 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, are the appellants herein.
2. The suit was filed for declaration of title and for injunction with regard to item No.1 and for recovery of possession of item No.2.
3. The allegations in the plaint go to show that the schedule property belonged to one K.V.G. Murthy having purchased item No.1 from one P.Subba Rao and item No.2 was assigned by the Government. The plaintiff is the brother’s son of the said K.V.G. Murthy, who executed a Will on 30.09.1992 bequeathing the schedule properties to the plaintiff and died on 08.10.1992. The plaintiff got possession of item No.1. The 1st defendant is the wife of the second defendant and they have no right over the schedule property. The 1st defendant is an orphan and without any right taking advantage that she worked as a maid servant for sometime in the house of deceased K.V.G. Murhty forcibly took possession of item No.2 of the schedule property. Under the above circumstances, the suit was filed after issuing a legal notice.
4. The defendants filed a written statement. The ownership of K.V.G. Murthy in the schedule properties is admitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.