SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 1122

N.R.L.NAGESWARA RAO
Pagadala Bharathi – Appellant
Versus
J. Radha Krishna – Respondent


Judgment

The defendants in O.S.No.21 of 1994 on the file of the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, are the appellants herein.

2. The suit was filed for declaration of title and for injunction with regard to item No.1 and for recovery of possession of item No.2.

3. The allegations in the plaint go to show that the schedule property belonged to one K.V.G. Murthy having purchased item No.1 from one P.Subba Rao and item No.2 was assigned by the Government. The plaintiff is the brother’s son of the said K.V.G. Murthy, who executed a Will on 30.09.1992 bequeathing the schedule properties to the plaintiff and died on 08.10.1992. The plaintiff got possession of item No.1. The 1st defendant is the wife of the second defendant and they have no right over the schedule property. The 1st defendant is an orphan and without any right taking advantage that she worked as a maid servant for sometime in the house of deceased K.V.G. Murhty forcibly took possession of item No.2 of the schedule property. Under the above circumstances, the suit was filed after issuing a legal notice.

4. The defendants filed a written statement. The ownership of K.V.G. Murthy in the schedule properties is admitted




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top