SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 456

BILAL NAZKI, S.ANANDA REDDY
GODAVARI FERTILISERS & CHEMICALS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S. Krishna Murthy - Petitioner.

JUDGMENT

S. ANANDA REDDY, J.

This special appeal by the assessee is directed against the order, dated January 3, 1994 passed by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes under section 2(1) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 (herein after referred to "the Act"), exercising the powers of revision, revising the order of the Appellate Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, who allowed the appeal of the assessee.

The assessee-company was dealing in fertilisers during the assessment year 1986-87. The assessee-company has got a factory at Kakinada, East Godavari district for the manufacture of various fertilisers, which commenced its production in the year 1988. But, in order to establish the market to its products, the assessee-company imported certain fertilisers, such as Di-Ammonia Phosphate (DAP), Urea, etc., and sold through its distributors. For the assessment year in question, the assessee declared a gross-turnover of Rs. 38,48,09,511 and a net turnover of Rs. 31,76,66,874. In the assessment proceedings, the assessee claimed exemption of the turnover to the extent of Rs. 1,87,89,413, being the amount represented the discount allowed to various dealers by issuing credit






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top