SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(AP) 33

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, V.NEELADRI RAO
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
GLIMMER EXPORTS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
The Government Pleader for C.T. Department, for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

The judgment of the Court was delivered by

B. P. JEEVAN REDDY, J. - Mica is taxable at the point of purchase by the last dealer who buys in the State at the rate of 3 per cent. The respondent is a dealer in mica. He submitted a return for the assessment year 1971-72, showing a gross turnover of Rs. 1,55,661.50. Out of it he claimed exemption in respect of Rs. 153.65, the balance being shown as net turnover. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer accepted the turnover, but his order was revised by the Deputy Commissioner under section 20(2) of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. The Deputy Commissioner observed that the Deputy Commissioner Tax Officer did not take the opening and closing stock into consideration while arriving at the net turnover and that neither the assessment order nor the assessment record showed the details for arriving at the last purchase turnover. He directed that the assessing authority had to compute the purchase turnover of the inter-State sales and foreign sales which become the last purchase turnover taxable at the hands of the dealer. Accordingly he determined the turnover at Rs. 1,93,625. Against the order of the Deputy Commissioner, th



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top