CHANDRA REDDY, NARASIMHAM
RAYAVARAPU MRITYANJAYA RAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH – Respondent
CHANDRA REDDY, C.J.
The order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal is canvassed in this revision case.
The petitioner who grows casuarina appears to have cut the trees into short pieces for purposes of transporting them to places where they could be sold. He claimed exemption in respect of the sale of this casuarina on the basis of the proviso to section 2(i) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act (the statute that governs the present case). This request of the petitioner was negatived by the department as also by the Tribunal in the view that it does not fall within the ambit of the proviso as it stood at the relevant time. It is against this decision of the Appellate Tribunal affirming that of the Assistant Commissioner (C.T.) who in his turn confirmed the assessment made by the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, that this revision is carried.
In this case, it is urged by Sri Kuppuswamy that the instant case attracts the applicability of the proviso and consequently his client is entitled to the exemption contemplated by the proviso. It is convenient at this stage to extract the terms of the relevant proviso, which is as under :
"Provided that in the case of a sale by a person o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.