SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(AP) 186

BHIMASANKARAM
JAI DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, OSMANGANJ – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C. Mallikarjuna Rao, for the petitioner.
The Third Government Pleader, for the respondent.

ORDER

This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Osmanganj, Hyderabad, to forbear from further proceedings on the basis of a notice dated 9th November, 1957, served by him on the petitioner. That notice was issued by the respondent under rule 56 of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Rules, 1957, requiring the petitioner to appear in person and to produce or cause to produce all the books of account with relevant vouchers of Messrs Jaya Dayal Roshanlal, Osmanganj, for the years 1954-55 and 1955-56. The petitioner, it is not denied, carried on business in grains with one Kanhailal under the firm name of Jaya Dayal Roshanlal, dealers in grains and commission agents. But according to the petitioner, the firm which came into existence on 26th October, 1954, was dissolved on 18th May, 1956.

The petitioner impeaches the validity of the proceedings initiated by the notice. In the first place, he challenges the right of the respondent to assess a dissolved firm. His contention is that when the firm was dissolved on 18th May, 1956, it ceased to exist as an entity for assessm



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top