SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 250

GOPAL RAO EKBOTE
J. B. Roy – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
E. Ayyapu Reddy and P.C. Lakshmana Rao, for Petitioner; Public Prosecutor, for the State.

ORDER :-

This is a revision petition directed against the order of the Additional District Munsif-Magistrate, Srikakulam given on 26th July, 1966 whereby the learned Magistrate directed the issue of summonses in the names of eight witnesses whom the prosecution wanted to examine. It appears that the Station House Officer, Srikakulam Town filed a charge-sheet against the accused under Section 304-A, I.P.C. Along with the charge-sheet, a list of witnesses also was filed according to which three witnesses were mentioned as eye witnesses. One of them died before the commencement of the trial. The prosecution therefore produced P.Ws. 2 and 3, the other eye witnesses. They however were declared hostile and permission was granted to the prosecution to cross-examine them.

2. Subsequently, the prosecution filed an application under Sections 251-A (7) and 540, Cr. P.C. seeking permission to examine eight more witnesses cited in the application. It was stated that out of the eight witnesses, witnesses mentioned in Serial Nos. 1 to 4 were examined in the course of investigation while the remaining were examined by the police only after P.W. 2 had turned hostile in the Court.

3. The petition was
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top