SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(AP) 157

BHIMASANKARAM
VEERAMACHANENI BUTCHAIAH CHOWDARY – Appellant
Versus
NOOLI VENKATA SUBRAHMANYAM – Respondent


Judgement:-

Bhimasankaram, J.

[1] The question raised in these proceedings is one of considerable importance. It relates to the jurisdiction of an officer described as an Executive Magistrate to pass an attachment order under Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

[2] There are, in the Andhra State, a number of districts where the policy embodied in Article 50 of the Constitution of India "of separating the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State" is being implemented while there are a few districts where it is not. Such separation, where it is in force, is effected not by legislation hut administratively under the terms of G. O Ms. No. 2304 Public (Separation) Department, dated 24-9-1952. originally issued by the Government of Madras (when the Andhra State was part of the Madras State) which still continues to be operative within the Stale of Andhra. This G. O. is styled as a 'Memorandum of instructions issued for the guidance of the Judicial and Executive Magistrates under the Madras Scheme of Separation of the Judiciary from the Executive". The scheme is designed within the framework of the Criminal Procedure Code and the powers and the functions o


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top