SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(AP) 60

RANGANADHAM CHETTY
KONDA SESHA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
MUTHYALA CHINA PULLAIAH – Respondent


Judgement:-

Ranganadham Chetty, J.

[1] This is a petition by the accused for revising the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nellore dated 15-6-1956 made on Criminal Revision Petition No. 10 of 1956. The, facts of the case, in brief, are, China Fullalah1; claiming to be a lessee of certain lands from one Ramachandraiah, minor represented by his mother, Kasamma, filed a complaint charging the 37 accused with offences punishable Under Sections 379, 143 and 447, I, P.C.

He alleged that he took possession of the land from the aforesaid Kasamma and raised a Ragi crop in the beginning of December 1955. He was tending the crop with water taken from the well and the crop was in fact, ripe for being cut in four days' time when all the accused unlawfully entered on the land, and cut and carried away the crop.

[2] The Sub-Magistrate, Kanigiri, took a sworn statement from the complainant and dismissed the complaint as relating t6 a dispute of a civil nature. The complainant preferred a revision before the Additional District and Sessions Judge, who, on a perusal of the records and hearing the complainant, held that it was too premature for the Magistrate to come to a conclusion




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top