SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 184

KUMARAYYA
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Appellant
Versus
MANGALDAS V. THAKKER – Respondent


Judgement:-

Kumarayya, J.

[1] This appeal is against the order of the acquittal of Mangaldas V. Thakker, Manager, Golden Tobacco Company who was charged with an offence under Section 92 of the Factories Act, 1948. It appears that on 8-7-1956, when the Regional Inspector of Factories, Guntur, went for inspection after 5-30 p.m., he found 823 female workers working in the factory between 5-30 and 6-30 p.m. even though according to the notice displayed' on the Board, the hours of work of female workers were specified from 7-30 a.m. to 11-30 a.m. and 1-30 p.m. to 5-30 p.m. This is said to be a clear contravention of S 63 of the Factories Act of 1948.

He also found that the muster roll maintained was not marked for those workers on the date and this was a contravention of Rule 103 of the Madras Factories Rules framed under the Act. The Manager in defence stated that though the notified hours were as per Ex, P-2, the workers did not come to their work at 7-30 a.m. on account of heavy rain fall and the work in fact had to start from 9 a.m. with the result that in order to make up the full hours for the day, they worked beyond 5-30 p.m. As to the second charge his defence was that the conce













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top