SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(AP) 17

JAGANMOHAN REDDY
K. JAYARAMA IYER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HYDERABAD – Respondent


Judgement:-

Jaganmohan Reddy, J.

[1] This criminal revision is filed by the accused on the ground that the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to try the case or to take cognizance of the offence after the enactment of Criminal Law Amendment Act, 46 of 1952, and the extension of Corruption Act to Part B States.

[2] The facts of the case are evident from the challan dated 13-10-1952 filed by the Police against the accused under Section 342, Hyderabad Penal Code, corresponding to Section 409, Indian Penal Code, which states as follows:

1. The accused Major K. Jayaram Iyer, a public servant in the employ of the Central Government, just after Police Action, took over the administration of the Post Offices at Hyderabad in the capacity of a Liaison Officer on 18-9-1948 and assumed charge as the Post-Master General of the Hyderabad State Postal Services on 27-10-1948, and worked as such till he relinquished his said Office and proceeded on leave, with effect from 1-4-1950.

2. Property as per List 'A' attached was purchased at the instance of the accused during tenure of his Office out of Government funds for Government purposes.

3. Accused had entrustment of and dominion over the set of Government



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top