SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(AP) 136

SUBBA RAO, BHIMASANKARAM
GOVERNMENT PLEADER – Appellant
Versus
A. R. VAJIRAVELU CHETTY – Respondent


Judgement:-

Subba Rao, C. J.

[1] This is an application for committing the respondents for contempt of Court and to punish them in accordance with law.

[2] Respondent 1, Vijaravelu Chetty, is the President of the Kuppam Panchayat Board. On 20-8-1953, he sent a communication to the Superintendent, X Branch, Anti-corruption Madras, making allegations of corruption against Sri p Gopalakrishna District Munsif-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kuppam Chittoor District. The communication contained the following allegations:

I have received certain information which I think it my imperative duty to pass on to you for necessary action. This information is in respect of the rampant corruption existing in the District Munsif-cum-Sub-Divisional Magistrate's Court, Kuppam.

The Magistrate is Sri P. Gopalakrishnan of Avidi of East Godavary District. He was first appointed as Additional District Munsif of Chittoor in November 1949. Even then his honesty was suspected.

He was messing in the Golden Cafe, Chittoor. He never paid the hotel bills. But he compensated the hotel keeper by decreeing a suit in his favour.

There was a batch of nearly dozen suits between the ryots and the inamdars of Mundlapudi. The























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top