SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(AP) 1040

B.CHANDRA KUMAR
Badavath Janna Bai – Appellant
Versus
Afsari Begum – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:S. Surender Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R2, K. Ashok Rama Rao, Advocate.

Judgment :

This appeal is directed against the order and decree dated 22.07.2002 passed in O.P.No.536 of 1999 by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-District Judge, Adilabad.

The appellant hereinafter will be referred to as claimant for the sake of convenience. She filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation.

The brief facts of the case are as follows. On 24.3.1999 at about 4-00 p.m, the claimant and others were travelling in the auto bearing No.1 U 1857 from Kavval to Jannaram Village and when the said auto fell in a pit due to the rash and negligent driving of its driver, she sustained multiple injuries including fracture to her back bone. The claimant filed the above OP claiming total compensation of Rs.50,000/-

The first respondent-owner of the auto remained ex parte. The second respondent-insurance company, with which the auto was insured, denied the material averments made by the claimant and denied its liability on the ground that the driver of the auto had no valid driving licence at the time of the accident.

Basing on the respective pleadings, the Tribunal framed the following issues for trial.

1. Whether the accident occurred on 24.3.1999 due to rash and
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top