SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(AP) 43

SUBBA RAO
M. Gnanamani – Appellant
Versus
Governor of Andhra – Respondent


Advocates:
P. Babulu Reddi, for Petitioner; Advocate-General, for Respondents.

ORDER :- This is an application for issuing a writ of certiorari to quash the orders passed by the Government of Andhra and the State of Andhra.

2. The petitioner is a B.E. of the Madras University. He was working in the II Circle as an Assistant Engineer. On 15-1-1953, an order of Government dated 22-12-1952 was served on him imposing the penalty of compulsory retirement. Against that order, he preferred an appeal to the Governor of Madras. After the Andhra State was formed, the papers were transferred to the Governor of Andhra for disposal.

When he wrote to the Governor of Andhra for information, he received a reply from the Secretary that his petition was sent to the Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Andhra, for disposal. Among other grounds, he claimed that the action of the Governor in asking the Government to dispose of the appeal was without jurisdiction and reduced the provisions for an appeal to a farce, as the very authority which passed the original orders was asked to dispose of the appeal. He asks for the issue of a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Governor, as well as the Government.

3. I gave notice to the Advocate General to argue the point,




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top