SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(AP) 97

SUBBA RAO, SATYANARAYANA RAJU
In re Alla Nageswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.V. Rama Rao, for P. Kameswara Rao, for Petitioner; Public Prosecutor, (D. Munikanniah), for the State.

Judgement

SUBBA RAO, C.J. :- After we heard this appeal for some time, it was brought to our notice that the accused, who is a poor man, was not given a real opportunity to defend the charge against him for murder. The accused was defended by an advocate in the Committing Magistrates Court. But, before the Sessions Judge, it is represented by the learned counsel for the accused and it is not denied by the learned Public Prosecutor, that an advocate was engaged for the accused two hours prior to the trial. However eminent and intelligent an advocate might be, we are not satisfied that he could have done any justice to the case in such a short time.

2. It must be borne in mind that the accused should be given every reasonable opportunity to put forward their case and their defence, particularly when a charge for a grave offence is levelled against them. Rule 228 of the Criminal Rules of Practice reads :

"A pleader will be engaged at the cost of the State to defend an accused person, who does not engage a pleader himself and who is under sentence of death or has been called upon to show cause why a sentence of death should not be passed upon him or against whom an appeal has been filed u



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top