SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 25

CHANDRA REDDY, QAMAR HASAN
Dr. G. Thimma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Ramachandia Rao, for Petitioner; A. Gangadhara Rao for Govt. Pleader, for the State.

Judgement

CHANDRA REDDY, J. : -

These two matters can be disposed of together as the latter arises out of the former. The petitioner in W. P. No. 573 of 1956 sought to have the order of the Government of Andhra State D/- 12-6-1956 in G. O. Ms. No. 1030 (Health), placing him under suspension pending enquiry into allegations of corruption and mal-practice by the Tribunal for disciplinary proceedings quashed. When Rule Nisi was issued, an interim stay was granted. After notice to the parties and hearing; both sides, Mr. Justice Krishnarao dissolved the interim stay. It is that order that is the subject of the Writ Appeal No. 83 of 1956.

2. The facts as emerge from the material on record are as follows :

The petitioner entered service in 1930 as Assistant Surgeon and was promoted as D.M.O. in or about the year 1947. Till about May. 1953. be served in that capacity in various districts. He was transferred to Krishna in June, 1953 and was there till August, 1953. Thereafter he was transferred to Anantapur as D.M.O. During his service in that district, certain charges were framed against him and an enquiry was held by the Tribunal for disciplinary proceedings and it was concluded on the 27





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top