SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 93

KRISHNA RAO
Dhulipalla Ramayya – Appellant
Versus
Kota Brahmayya – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, for Petitioners ; Alladi Kuppuswamy, for Respondents.

ORDER : This revision is directed against the finding of the Additional District Munsif, Nellore on a preliminary issue in O. S. 712 of 1951 on his file, by which he negatived the 1st defendants contention that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction to try the suit. The 1st respondent-plaintiff brought the suit for partition and recovery of possession of his one-third share in the plaint lands and for other incidental reliefs. His case is that he and defendants 1 to 5 are joint shrotriamdars of Kuricherlapad, shrotrium, that he owns 4-12th share in the shrotrium, that the 1st defendant is entitled to 1/12th share and the defendants 2 and 3 to 4/12th share and defendants 4 and 5 to the remaining 3/12th share, that the two items of plaint lands consisting of survey Nos. 160 and 161 were anadhinam lands, that S. No. 160 was progressively reclaimed at the joint expense of all the shrotriumdars between 1940 and 1949 and that Survey No. 161 was similarly re-claimed by all of them between 1945 and 1949.

Although the lands were jointly owned and enjoyed by them, the 1st defendant began to assert exclusive title and possession in himself in respect of both the lands on the ground that he had be

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top