MOHAMMED AHMED ANSARI
D. Sardar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Seth Pissumal Harbhagwandas Bankers – Respondent
2. The facts in the case are not complicated. On June 16, 1949, the respondent had a house No. 31, Sadar Bazar, Bolaram, attached in execution of his decree against Abdul Majid Khan. The appellant by a sale deed of June 20, 1949, has purchased the same house. Some of the executants of the sale deed are not the owners; but profess to be holders of two powers of attorney from four persons, who claim to be the owners and were then in Pakistan. One of such executants is Mohd. Ayud Khan and purports to be the holder of a power of attorney from Abdul Majid Khan. The other, Abdul Rahman Khan, claims to have another power of attorney in his favour by Abdul Aziz Khan. Abdul Haq Khan and Mt. Kulfatbi.
Both these powers of attorney are admitted to have been executed and registered in Pakistan. Ex. P. 6 is the document in favour of Abdul Majid, and Ex. P. 7 is in favour of the Abdul Rahman Khan. These, however, are not on the records of the case; but the learned Judge of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.