SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(AP) 117

UMAMAHESWARAM
Peddireddi Ganga Raju – Appellant
Versus
Kandula Mangamma – Respondent


Advocates:
Adavi Rama Rao, for Petitioner; K. Sivaprasada Rao, for P.V. Vallabhacharlu, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT : This is an application by the decree-holder in Small Cause Suit No. 674 of 1953 to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada in E. P. No. 260 of 1954 allowing rateable distribution under S. 73, Code of Civil Procedure, to the decree-holder in Small Cause Suit No. 476 of 1952.

2. In order to appreciate the contention raised by Sri Adavi Kama Rao, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, it is necessary to set out a few relevant facts. The respondents herein filed E. P. No. 429 of 1953 in execution of his decree in S. C. No. 476 of 1952 and attached the cattle belonging to the 3rd judgment-debtor Mangamma. The cattle were entrusted to a surety who executed a bond undertaking to produce the cattle as and when called upon to do so.

As the surety did not later on produce the cattle, the Execution Petition was dismissed on 1-3-1954. The decree-holder thereupon filed E. P. No. 237 of 1954 on 8-3-1954. Meanwhile the same cattle were attached by the petitioner herein in E. P. No. 260 of 1954 in execution of his decree in S. C. No. 674 of 1953 and a sum of Rs. 362-13-0 was realised by sale on 22-9-1954. The respondent herein contended that as he had filed E. P. No, 237 of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top