SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 439

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Telugu Chinna Thirupathaiah – Appellant
Versus
Boya Nadipi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Janaki Rami Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioner.
G. Sravan Kumar, Counsel for the Respondent.

ORDER

1. This civil revision petition is filed against order, dated 6.9.2011, in I.A. No. 838 of 2011 in OS No. 685 of 2008, on the file of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool.

2. The petitioner filed the suit for mandatory injunction directing the respondent to remove the door and two windows erected by the latter in AF marked wall in the plaint plan. After completion of the evidence of PWs. l to 4 and when the case was coming up for further evidence, the petitioner filed I.A. No. 838 of 2011 under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit. This application having been dismissed by the lower Court, the petitioner filed the present civil revision petition.

3. I have heard Sri J. Janaki Rami Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri G. Sravan Kumar, learned Counsel for the respondent.

4. In his affidavit filed in support of the application for permission to withdraw the suit, the petitioner has stated that the respondent has highhandedly erected a door and two windows in AF wall when the petitioner was not in station that in his plaint, the petitioner pleaded that ABFE wall adjoining his ABCD house is in possession of








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top