SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 619

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, S.V.BHATT
Silaparasetti Ramu – Appellant
Versus
Lalam Ramanamma @ Rajani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:N.P. Satyanarayana, Advocate.
For the Respondent:C. Raghu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.

The petitioner in O.P.No.247 of 2002 on the file of the Family Court, Hyderabad filed this appeal, feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 27.05.2004.

The appellant married the respondent on 05.04.2001 at Balaji Bhawan (Temple), Himayathnagar, Hyderabad. According to him, he became acquainted with the respondent in the course of train journey and that acquaintance developed into a close relation and thereafter, to marriage. On 06.04.2001, the marriage was registered.

The appellant filed the O.P. under Section 12 (i) (c) of the Hindu Marriage Act with a prayer to declare the marriage between himself and the respondent as null and void abinitio. He pleaded that by the time their marriage took place, there was a subsisting marriage between the respondent on the one hand, and one Sri Y.Ramana Murthy on the other. He stated that shortly after his marriage with the respondent, he came to know about her marriage with Ramana Murthy and has immediately filed the O.P. He further pleaded that though the respondent stated that her marriage with Ramana Murthy was dissolved according to the customs prevailing in their community, the same cannot be accepted in la




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top