M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
N. Hanmanth Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Razia Begum – Respondent
Heard Sri D.Prakash Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Sri Venkata Rao Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ashok Ananda Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. These Revisions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the separate orders dt.13-03-2013 in I.A.No.151 of 2008 (new) (old I.A.No.102 of 2006) in O.S.No.36 of 2001 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Zaheerabad, and in I.A.No.67 of 2013 in the same suit.
3. The petitioner in the Civil Revision petitions is the plaintiff in the above suit. He filed the said suit on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Sangareddy against respondents 1 to 8 for specific performance of an agreement of sale dt.09-12-1997 executed by them in his favour in respect of land in Sy.No.127 AA of Zaheerabad. Summons were sent for service on respondents/defendants by the Court through the process server of the Court. It appears that when the process server sought to serve the summons on the respondents at the address 8-4-380/1/29/A, Premnagar, Erragadda, Hyderabad (for short, the ‘Erragadda address’), the ladies in the household refused to take the summons or to affix the same on the door of the premises.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.