Subject matter of these three revision petitions is condition imposed by the lower Court for payment of remuneration at the rate of Rs.80,000/- per month from 01.01.2007 till the date of discharge as an Advocate for the revision petitioner/plaintiff. The 4th respondent herein is one of the four advocates who appeared for the plaintiff in these three suits in the lower Court. The plaintiff filed petitions in three suits under Order III Rule 4 C.P.C for discharging the 4th respondent herein as the plaintiff’s advocate. While allowing the said petitions, the lower Court imposed a rider that the plaintiff should pay the 4th respondent’s remuneration at the rate of Rs.80,000/- per month after deduction of T.D.S from 01.01.2007 till the date of his discharge.

2) Sheet anchor of the revision petitioner and senior counsel appearing for the revision petitioner is decisions of the Supreme Court in R.D. SaxenaV. Balram Prasad Sharma (2000)7 Supreme Court Cases 264) and New India Assurance Co. Ltd V. A.K. Saxena (2004)1 Supreme Court Cases 117). On the other hand, the 4th respondent in person contended that the lower Court is within its legal jurisdiction to direct the plaintiff to