SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 741

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, S.V.BHATT
Kantilal G. Jain – Appellant
Versus
C. Sailaja – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Mrs. D. Vathsalendra, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Y. Rama Rao, Advocate.

Judgment :

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.

1. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place in the year 1989 when both of them were studying M.B.B.S. Course, at Bangalore. It is stated to be love marriage and that at a later point of time, a formal marriage was performed on 20-05-1990 at Tirupati in the presence of the parents of the respondent. The marriage is said to have been registered, five years thereafter, i.e., on 28-03-1995, when they have shifted their residence to Hyderabad. They were also blessed with two daughters.

2. The appellant filed O.P.No.685 of 2006 before the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad for divorce against the respondent, under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short ‘the Act’). He pleaded the grounds of cruelty and desertion on the part of the respondent. In the O.P., the appellant pleaded that after the birth of the second daughter, the respondent insisted that he should get his share in the property of his parents at Shimoga, Karnataka State and when she did not agree for the establishment of a Diagnostic Centre at Mangalore, he was compelled to come back to Hyderabad to practice medicine. He has also stated

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top