C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Moku Narayana Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Joint Collector, Warangal – Respondent
1. This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.E5/3866/2012 dated 10.07.2013 of respondent No.1.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. The petitioners were granted pattadar passbooks and title deeds in the year 2000. Feeling aggrieved thereby, respondent Nos.4 to 7 have filed an appeal before respondent No.2 in the year 2004. The said appeal was allowed by respondent No.2, vide his order dated 24.03.2012, whereby he has set aside the patttadar passbooks and title deeds issued to the petitioners and directed respondent No.3 to round off the names of the petitioners and mutate the names of respondent Nos.4 to 7 in the record of rights. Questioning the said order, the petitioners filed a revision petition before respondent No.1. By the order impugned in this writ petition, respondent No.1 has dismissed the revision petition by a cryptic order, which reads as under:
“On perusal of the claims of the petitioner and after careful examination of the records, the revision petition is not maintainable U/s 9 of ROR Act, as the dispute regarding Title and Possession, which should be decided by a competent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.