SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 119

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Madala Rama Rao – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Krishna District – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
P.N Murthy, Counsel for the Petitioners;
AGP for Revenue, Counsel for the Respondents.

ORDER

This is a third round of litigation pertaining to the proposed acquisition of the petitioners lands for the purpose of providing house sites to weaker sections. A notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act') was issued in the year 2006 in respect of Acs.4-00 of land in RS Nos. 184/1, 271/1, 271/2, 271/3, 271/4, 271/5 and 271/7 of Angaluru Village, Gudlavalleru Mandal, Krishna District.

2. Writ Petition No. 11882 of 2006 was filed questioning the action of the respondents in dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order, dated 15.6.2006, by holding that no urgency was involved for dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5-A of the Act and an enquiry was directed to be held. Accordingly, enquiry was held and an order was passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer-respondent No. 2 rejecting the petitioners objections. Questioning the said order, the petitioners filed WP Nos. 23548 and 24953 of 2006. This Court has granted interim order in the said cases, as a result of which, the land acquisition proceedings could not be proceeded. Eventually, this Court by common j












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top