The petitioners/appellants in SAMP No.853 of 2011 seek direction to the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the plaint schedule property pending disposal of the second appeal. After admission of the second appeal on substantial questions of law, this Court on 6.7.2010 in SAMP No.371 of 2010 ordered status quo until further orders. This status quo order was obtained by the appellants without disclosing delivery proceedings on 8.1.2010 in the execution proceedings in the executing Court and also the appellants' own petition filed therein on 25.2.2010 by way of EA SR No.1479 of 2010 in EP No.184 of 2009 to declare the delivery effected on 8.1.2010 as null and void and not to record the delivery. Subsequently when the said fact was brought to the notice of this Court in SAMP No.119 of 2011 requesting to vacate the status quo order, this Court by order dated 7.2.2011 vacated the status quo order. But while vacating the status quo order, this Court permitted the appellants to file another application for renewing the status quo order in the event of the statement of delivery of possession on 8.1.2010 is incorrect. Thereupon, the appellants become emboldened to file th