G.YETHIRAJULU
Gorantla Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Kolla Veera Raghava Rao – Respondent
The complainant and the accused are same in both the cases. Both the cases relate to the transactions of a cheque, therefore, the appeal as well as the revision petition are clubbed and this common judgment is delivered.
Crl. Appeal No. 1581 of 1999
2. Criminal Appeal No. 1581 of 1999 is preferred by the complainant in C.C.No. 1 of 1995 on the file of the V Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur. The appellant filed a private complaint against the first respondent (accused) for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short 'the Act'). The learned Magistrate after considering the evidence adduced by the complainant found the accused guilty of the offence, convicted and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 138 of the Act, through judgment dated 9-1-1997. The accused, being aggrieved by the conviction and the sentence imposed by the learned Magistrate, preferred Criminal Appeal No. 12 of 1997 on the file of the 1 Additional Sessions Judge, Guntur. The learned Sessions Judge, through judgment dated 23-7-1999, set aside the conviction and the sentence imposed by the learned Magistrate for the off
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.