SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 897

G.ROHINI
B. Kesav Rao – Appellant
Versus
P. Sivannarayana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K. Sarvabhouma Rao, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K. Prabhakar, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

The revision petitioner is the defendant in O.S.No.348/2011 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. The suit is filed by the respondent herein for recovery of money allegedly due from the defendant/revision petitioner. The defendant filed his written statement contesting the suit claim. Thereafter the plaintiff filed I.A. No.451/2013 under Order XII Rule 6 of C.P.C contending that there was a clear admission in the written statement to the extent of Rs.45 lakhs out of the suit claim and accordingly praying the Court to grant a decree to the extent of the admitted amount of Rs.45 lakhs. Though the defendant opposed the said application contending that there was no clear admission as sought to be contended by the plaintiff, the Court below negatived the said contention and by order dated 05.07.2013 allowed I.A. No.451/2013 holding that there are valid and sufficient grounds to give a judgment having regard to the admissions made in the written statement. Accordingly a decree in part was granted against the defendant and in favour of the plaintiff for a sum of Rs.45 lakhs. Aggrieved by the said order dated 05.07.2013 the present revision petit








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top