SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 987

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
K. Venkat Rao – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Kurnool District – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:M. Damodar Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondents: AGP for Revenue.

JUDGMENT

This Writ Petition is filed assailing the order, dated 29.08.2012, of respondent No.3 in proceedings, vide Rc.B/212/2012, issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds in favour of respondent No.4 in respect of the land admeasuring Acs.6.70 cents in Survey No.904 of Karivemula Village, Devanakonda Mandal, Krunool District and also to declare the inaction of respondent No.2 in entertaining the appeal filed by the petitioners and disposing of the same as illegal and arbitrary.

2. A perusal of the prayer in the Writ Petition would show that the same is in contradictory terms. On one hand, the petitioners sought for invalidation of the action of respondent No.3 in issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds to respondent No.4 and on the other, they have sought for declaration of the inaction of respondent No.2 in disposing of the appeal filed by them, against the order of respondent No. 3 in issuing pattadar passbooks and title deeds to respondent No. 4, as illegal and arbitrary.

3. In my opinion, having filed an appeal before respondent No. 2 against the order of respondent No. 3, issuing the pattadar passbooks and title deeds in favour of respondent No. 4, the petitioners cannot







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top