SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 932

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
John Santiyago – Appellant
Versus
Clement Dass – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mohd. Shafuddin, Advocate.
For the Respondents:D. Jagadeshwar Rao, Advocate.

Judgment :

1. These three Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the common order of dismissal dated 16.03.2012 of the learned XI Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, made in I.A.Nos.214, 215 and 216 of 2012 in O.S.No.559 of 2006 filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs to reopen the evidence on the side of the plaintiffs; to recall PW1 for the purpose of marking/exhibiting two documents viz., (i) Covering letter dated 11.04.2011 addressed to the first plaintiff by a Public Information Officer/DAG (Administration) and (ii) Form of application for service pension/Family Pension/Retirement Gratuity/Service Gratuity/ Commutation submitted by Smt. Chaya Devi showing her as the wife of Sri S.S.Dass; and to receive the aforementioned two documents on file after according necessary leave and by condoning the delay in filing the said documents.

2. The facts that are necessary for consideration and for arriving at just decision in these civil revision petitions, in brief, are as under:

(a) “The petitioners/plaintiffs (‘plaintiffs’) filed the suit for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule property against the respondents/defendants (‘defenda















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top