M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
Bayyarapu Narayana Raidu – Appellant
Versus
Pagadala Varalaxmi, Hyderabad – Respondent
1. This appeal is filed under Order LVIII Rule 1(u) of CPC challenging the order dt.16.11.2012 in AS.No.120 of 2010 of the II Addl. District Judge, Warangal, setting aside the judgment and decree dt.21.07.2010 in OS.No.778 of 2006 of the Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, and remitting the matter back to the Trial Court for fresh disposal.
2. The appellants are defendants in the above suit.? The said suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff for recovery of possession of the plaint schedule property from the defendants and for costs.
3. The plaintiff contended that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the plaint schedule property which she had purchased from Smt. K. Shyamalabai under a registered sale deed Ex.A.1/dt.25.08.1981; that her vendor had purchased the said property from its original owner Modem Kanakaiah (for short, ‘Kanakiah’) under a private sale deed Ex.A2/dt.08.03.1973;? that on account of employment of her husband and after his demise, she is staying with her daughters at Hyderabad; that the defendants who are residing towards the southern side of the plaint schedule property occupied it by erecting a shed and a compound wall and this was discovered wh
Narayanan Vs. Kumaran and others (2004) 4 SCC 26)
Jegannathan v. Raju Sigamani and another (2012) 5 SCC 540).
Karnataka Board of Wakf v. Govt. of India (2004) 10 SCC 779)
Saroop Singh v. Banto (AIR 2005 SC 4407 at Pg.4412)
Ashwinkumar K.Patel Vs. Upendra J.Patel and others (AIR 1999 SC 1125)
P.Purushottam Reddy and another Vs. M/s.Pratap Steels Ltd.(AIR 2002 SC 771)
Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad Vs. Sunder Singh (2008) 8 SCC 485)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.