SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 1044

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, M.S.K.JAISWAL
P. Jayaram – Appellant
Versus
P. Sudha Laxmi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:U.V.S. Laur, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Bommanayuni Appa Rao, Advocate.

Judgment :

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.

1. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent took place on 30-11-2002 and they are also blessed with a child in the year 2004. Thereafter, the parties are living separately. While according to the appellant, the respondent left his house at the time of delivery of child and did not turn up, the version of the respondent is that the appellant deserted her and did not take her back in spite of repeated requests.

2. Alleging that the respondent resorted to acts of desertion and cruelty, the appellant filed O.P. No.91 of 2006 in the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy. He pleaded that soon after the marriage, the respondent started harassing him to put up a separate residence in spite of the fact that he is the only son to his old parents, who are suffering from various ailments and that though a separate residence was established, the respondent did not turn up. He pleaded that the acts of the respondent have also caused untold agony to his parents. Ultimately, he pleaded for decree of divorce.

3. The respondent filed a counter opposing the O.P. She pleaded that at the time of marriage, quite a considerable amount was given in cash and va

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top