SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(AP) 1088

L.NARASIMHA REDDY, M.S.K.JAISWAL
V. Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
V. Mamatha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: Party in person.
For the Respondent:G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Advocate.

Judgment :

L. Narasimha Reddy, J.

The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage was performed on 16.08.1998 at Secunderabad and out of the wedlock, they had two female children. The appellant filed O.P.No.353 of 2002 in the Family Court, Hyderabad for divorce against the respondent by pleading grounds of cruelty under Section 13 (i) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act (for short ‘the Act’). He pleaded that ever since the marriage, the respondent was harassing him on trivial issues and in fact, left the matrimonial house on 25.05.2000. Thereafter, she is said to have returned, but again left the home on 21.09.2000. He alleged that the respondent used to insist on putting a separate residence from the parents of the appellant and in spite of his best efforts, there was no change in her attitude. It was stated that though he got issued a legal notice, dated 28.04.2002, requiring the respondent to join him, she did not accede to the request and on the other hand, had initiated false criminal proceedings.

The O.P. was opposed by the respondent. She pleaded that at the time of marriage, dowry of Rs.3,00,000/- was given to the appellant apart from household articles and gold item















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top